Rook's Rolling Restoration

This is the place to discuss restoration problems, post questions or projects-complete or partial.
ROOK1

Rook's Rolling Restoration

Post by ROOK1 »

I use the term rolling loosely as it has only moved around in my neighborhood for the last 2 years. This will be the thread of my transformation. Nowhere as exciting as Wachuko's adventures.

Purchased 2 years ago for $500.00 not knowing if it ran as it didn't have any keys, idler arm was torn off the frame and there was 3 inches of water on the floor. Since then I have been collecting parts with whatever spare cash I could come up with. Purchased parts car for the gear box, kept a few other parts and sold many parts.

In the beginning there was.........

Image

Image

1) Fix the idler so I could roll it around the garage.

2) Get new keys made, luckily I found the key code in the original owners manual in the glove box.

3) Rewire the ignition switch, check every ground and clean, luckily I found the original wiring diagram in the glove box.

4) Replace fluids, check gas tank, fill it and turn it over. Vroom, but find out first gear is shot.

5) Buy parts car for transmission. Take chance as there are no guarantees the trans is good. Replace trans. Vroom X5

6) Buy misc parts and install. New tail lights, headlight rings and stone guards. Make headlight relay out of parts car wiring harness.

Image

Image

7) Cut out rusted seat risers and welded in replacements.

Image Partially fitted for welding.

Image Another.

Image Welded and painted.

Image With Protecto Wrap ready for carpet.

8) Stripped top and sanded bows. Header bow in near pristine shape, only 2 pin holes.

Image

Waiting for front suspension parts and carpet at this time.

More to come........
So Cal Mark

Re: Rook's Rolling Restoration

Post by So Cal Mark »

cool, keep us updated
User avatar
wachuko
Posts: 1175
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 10:56 pm
Your car is a: 1981 Fiat 2000 Spider
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Contact:

Re: Rook's Rolling Restoration

Post by wachuko »

This is great. Bringing back to life a beautiful early car. Keep us posted. Wish I had started with such a nicer looking car. Love those early bumper cars.

Subscribed!
Drive Safe!
Wachuko

1981 Fiat Spider Progress thread
1967 912 Progress Thread
1981 911 SC Coupe RS Transformation
1983 911 SC Coupe RSR Transformation
1991 964 C4 Cabriolet Progress Thread
2012 BMW X5 xDrive35d
2015 FIAT Abarth
ventura ace

Re: Rook's Rolling Restoration

Post by ventura ace »

Nice progress, Rook! Keep up the good work.

I have a question for you. Are the front bumper over-riders in their original positions, or are they switched around? Notice that the taller portion of the over-rider points down in your picture for the front bumper, and compare that to the rear over-riders where the taller end points up. It turns out that you can install them either way, and I've seen cars with them installed both ways. The pictures that I've seen in brochures and my owner's manual suggest that the taller end points up. I'm wondering if Fiat didn't pay a lot of attention and installed them either way, or maybe the owners have had them off and put them back on, and reversed them in the process. It really doesn't matter, and makes no difference in the look of the car, IMHO --- just curious, though.

Alvon
ROOK1

Re: Rook's Rolling Restoration

Post by ROOK1 »

I do believe they are on upside down. I figure they look like fangs of a spider so I havent bothered changing them.

Image
htchevyii
Patron 2022
Patron 2022
Posts: 1807
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 9:31 pm
Your car is a: 1982 Spider hers 1972 Spider his
Location: Hydesville, CA (NorCal)

Re: Rook's Rolling Restoration

Post by htchevyii »

Looking good, how's it sound with the SuperTrap? I haven't seen one of those for awhile.
Trey
Image
1982 SPIDER 2000, 1964 CHEVYII, 1969 Chevy Nova, 2005 DODGE RAM, 1988 Jeep Comanche
1972 Spider, 78 Spider rat racer 57 f-100,
ROOK1

Re: Rook's Rolling Restoration

Post by ROOK1 »

The sound is ok, better than stock but not as good as an Ansa. I am hoping to replace this with a more suitable option, but it will stay until funds allow for the upgrade.
rmalicki

Re: Rook's Rolling Restoration

Post by rmalicki »

That's looking awsome! Nice job! Keep up the good work. This is the fun part getting all the parts like a puzzel and making it how u want. Keep up with the pics.
ROOK1

Re: Rook's Rolling Restoration

Post by ROOK1 »

I got a package today from IAP. :D Now I have a project for the weekend.

New control arms.

Image

Speedo cable. Long black thing.

Turn signal lenses.

Image

Now for your input. Clear part with clear bulb or amber bulb?

Image

Image
User avatar
SLOSpider
Posts: 1140
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 2:10 am
Your car is a: 1973 124 Spider 2.0FI
Location: Lompoc, Ca USA

Re: Rook's Rolling Restoration

Post by SLOSpider »

Thats the package that should be at my door right now! I say the amber bulb.
1975 124 Spider
1976 Mazda Cosmo http://www.mazdacosmo.com
1989 Chevy k5 Blazer
1967 GT Mustang Fastback
User avatar
wachuko
Posts: 1175
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 10:56 pm
Your car is a: 1981 Fiat 2000 Spider
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Contact:

Re: Rook's Rolling Restoration

Post by wachuko »

Clear part goes with the amber bulb.

Looking good, keep those progress photos coming.
Drive Safe!
Wachuko

1981 Fiat Spider Progress thread
1967 912 Progress Thread
1981 911 SC Coupe RS Transformation
1983 911 SC Coupe RSR Transformation
1991 964 C4 Cabriolet Progress Thread
2012 BMW X5 xDrive35d
2015 FIAT Abarth
User avatar
stefhahn
Posts: 269
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:57 pm
Your car is a: 1979 Spider 2000
Location: Stuttgart / Germany

Re: Rook's Rolling Restoration

Post by stefhahn »

In Italy you will never see the clear part with a amber bulb.... so: clear bulb!
ROOK1

Re: Rook's Rolling Restoration

Post by ROOK1 »

Here is what I have been doing today.

Before

Image

After

Image


Does this look right?

Image

The spring looks overly curved to me. Also when the suspension is drooped like it is I cant move that sub shaft by hand like I could before the change. Mu guess is my old ball joins were so bad they allowed it to move unlike the new ones.

Looks better with shock installed.

Image
Last edited by ROOK1 on Sun May 09, 2010 1:17 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
ITA124
Posts: 128
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2008 1:51 am
Your car is a: 1976 Fiat 124 Spider
Location: Sydney, Australia

Re: Rook's Rolling Restoration

Post by ITA124 »

ROOK1 wrote:The spring looks overly curved to me. Also when the suspension is drooped like it is I cant move that sub shaft by hand like I could before the change. Mu guess is my old ball joins were so bad they allowed it to move unlike the new ones.
ROOK1,

The curve spring is normal. The reason you can't turn the stub axle is due to the angle of the ball joint. I like to put a scissor jack under the lower ball joint to take up some load. This allows for a better angle of the ball joint to move the stub axle and does not load up the shock when its installed.

Remember to torque the suspension rubber nuts when the arms are in their loaded position. Otherwise your rubbers will experience undue torsion stress and fail prematurely.
Paul


Fiat 124 Spider (Big Red Car. So my son tells me)
Toyota Corolla AE86 (Fiat as a daily driver? Not)
Fiat 128 Rally (Why did I sell this car?)
Fiat 124 AC (An iron ore waffle shaped like a 124. Donated to Sims)
Fiat 128 SL (First fiat)
User avatar
SLOSpider
Posts: 1140
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 2:10 am
Your car is a: 1973 124 Spider 2.0FI
Location: Lompoc, Ca USA

Re: Rook's Rolling Restoration

Post by SLOSpider »

Dont forget your shocks :)
Some pics from my last Spider I did:
Image

Image

Image
Image
1975 124 Spider
1976 Mazda Cosmo http://www.mazdacosmo.com
1989 Chevy k5 Blazer
1967 GT Mustang Fastback
Post Reply