Catalytic Converter

General chat about the car goes in here.
Post Reply
Nitrate
Posts: 278
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2015 5:38 pm
Your car is a: 1981 Fiat 2000

Catalytic Converter

Post by Nitrate »

1981, 2000. If I substitute a test pipe for my catalytic converter will it screw up the computer for my fuel injection system? RB
tima01864
Patron 2021
Patron 2021
Posts: 702
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 8:01 pm
Your car is a: 1983 FIAT Pininafarina Spider 2000
Location: Wilmington, MA

Re: Catalytic Converter

Post by tima01864 »

The oxygen sensor is on the manifold not on the converter.
TX82FIAT
Posts: 1814
Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 11:04 am
Your car is a: 82 Fiat Spider 2000 CSO
Location: San Antonio

Re: Catalytic Converter

Post by TX82FIAT »

chances are the car will run better if the old CAT was obstructed in any way. However, the inputs to the Ljet will remain unchanged with the exception of more air in. The car will be a little louder. The CAT does help reduce some sound.
Buon giro a tutti! - enjoy the ride!

82 Fiat Spider 2000
03 BMW M3
07 Chevy Suburban
Nitrate
Posts: 278
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2015 5:38 pm
Your car is a: 1981 Fiat 2000

Re: Catalytic Converter

Post by Nitrate »

Thanks to both who replied. I have my answer, thank you. RB
Slartibartfaster
Patron 2018
Patron 2018
Posts: 76
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2017 5:49 pm
Your car is a: 1979 Spider

Re: Catalytic Converter

Post by Slartibartfaster »

Though my car is not FI, you may find this interesting (or not)...copying from an earlier post of mine:

I considered swapping in a 'test' pipe...but then started reading so that was out. Not interested in driving a stinky, polluting car.
The car still has fewer than 24k miles so the converter couldn't have been too 'jammed up', but everything I've read about modern converters vs old points to a significant improvement in airflow and better environmental performance of the catalyst. This is the article I found most useful: https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/artic ... ter-face-/

Which catalytic converter was the next question... I'm keeping everything I change on the car and only making bolt-on changes in case a future caretaker wants to return it to stock. This means I'm not cutting the three bolt flanges off the old converter to weld on to a new generic converter. I bought a "MagnaFlow 23501 Direct Fit Catalytic Converter" for $139 prime. I'm continually surprised how hard it is to find specific details about auto parts online - always worried about 'direct fit' replacement actually being so.

In this case - the fit was pretty great out of the box. The flanges and attach points for the springs were properly aligned relative to the old converter and the overall length whole unit was within 1/4". Image Image And, you can see light through the inlet pipe...that's got to be good, right? The old one is like a maze inside. Best of all was the unexpected weight savings! Old unit was about 15lbs, new one is only 6lbs 3oz.ImageImage

So, does it feel different? Yes - definitely a power improvement and maybe a bit better sound as well, hard to tell. I don't like hard wrenching under the car but this was no too bad...a few hours start to finish. Used copper rtv, no gaskets and let it sit for 24 hours before starting to cure. Overall well worth the $140 and time spent!
Nitrate
Posts: 278
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2015 5:38 pm
Your car is a: 1981 Fiat 2000

Re: Catalytic Converter

Post by Nitrate »

Thank you for the new vs. old cat converter info. As it turns out the PO had installed the Magnaflow as a replacement for the original, so I'll leave every thing alone.
Post Reply