Whats more likely to need replacement first...

General chat about the car goes in here.
Post Reply
Jimb
Posts: 740
Joined: Mon May 05, 2008 1:03 am
Your car is a: 1985.5 Volumex

Whats more likely to need replacement first...

Post by Jimb »

Upper and lower ball joints or upper and lower swing arm bushings?
I'm putting new shocks on so I'm thinking that while I'm at it.
Jim
User avatar
Odoyle
Posts: 440
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2014 10:06 pm
Your car is a: 1983 Pinafarina Spider
Location: CA

Re: Whats more likely to need replacement first...

Post by Odoyle »

If boots are untorn on ball joints I would go with bushing replacement if you only had to pick 1.
zachmac
Posts: 1278
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2008 9:20 am
Your car is a: 1978 Spider [1979 2 ltr engine]
Location: Aiken, SC

Re: Whats more likely to need replacement first...

Post by zachmac »

But IMO the answer to your question the ball joints are most likely to wear out first. They see a much greater range of motion on a regular basis.
Why not do both while you are there? Also, I would recommend if you just do the ball joints then buy replacement ball joints (cheap and easy). If you are doing both the ball joints and the bushings consider buying loaded replacement upper and lower arms. Pressing the bushings in and out can easily damage the arms and is not a job to be done without the proper tools like a good hydraulic press.
Jeff Klein, Aiken, SC
1980 FI Spider, Veridian with Tan (sold about a year ago), in the market for another project
1989 Spider, sold
2008 Mercedes SL65
2008 S600 Mercedes V12
Jimb
Posts: 740
Joined: Mon May 05, 2008 1:03 am
Your car is a: 1985.5 Volumex

Re: Whats more likely to need replacement first...

Post by Jimb »

Great, thanks for the feedback.
Jim
Post Reply