1.8 or 2.0 engine

Keep it on topic, it will make it easier to find what you need.
Post Reply
dirk34

1.8 or 2.0 engine

Post by dirk34 »

Hi all, i own a 124 spider BS with a 1585 cc engine from the 131 supermirafiori built in.
I have also a 1800 cc and 2000 cc engine in my garage. What wil be the best to built into my spider for a bit more (sporty) driving fun ? The engine will be built up with a DMS 34 weber or the IDF 40 's.

Greetings from Belgium
Dirk
djape1977
Posts: 985
Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2012 6:08 pm
Your car is a: 1970 fiat 124bc
Location: Belgrade, Serbia, eastern Europe

Re: 1.8 or 2.0 engine

Post by djape1977 »

1800 revs better
So Cal Mark

Re: 1.8 or 2.0 engine

Post by So Cal Mark »

lots more torque with a 2L, best street motor in my opinion.
131
Posts: 672
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2010 1:13 am
Your car is a: 1982 131 Superbrava warmed 2.0 litre.
Location: Tasmania, Australia

Re: 1.8 or 2.0 engine

Post by 131 »

So Cal Mark wrote:lots more torque with a 2L, best street motor in my opinion.
X2. The torque of the 2 litre is seductive.
Mick.

'82 2litre 131, rally cams, IDFs & headers.
User avatar
RRoller123
Patron 2020
Patron 2020
Posts: 8179
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2011 2:04 pm
Your car is a: 1980 FI SPIDER 2000
Location: SAGAMORE BEACH, MA USA

Re: 1.8 or 2.0 engine

Post by RRoller123 »

My 2L will accelerate reasonably in 5th gear on level ground from 2k rpms, and smoothly too. Plenty of torque with this engine.
'80 FI Spider 2000
'74 and '79 X1/9 (past)
'75 BMW R75/6
2011 Chevy Malibu (daily driver)
2010 Chevy Silverado 2500HD Ext Cab 4WD/STD BED
2002 Edgewater 175CC 80HP 4-Stroke Yamaha
2003 Jaguar XK8
2003 Jaguar XKR
2021 Jayco 22RB
2019 Bianchi Torino Bicycle
vandor
Posts: 3996
Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 1:23 pm
Your car is a: 1971 124 Spider
Location: Texas, USA

Re: 1.8 or 2.0 engine

Post by vandor »

The only drawback to the 2000 is reduced hood-to-engine clearance. The problem areas will be the cambox mounted distributor and the cambelt cover. I ended notching the cambelt cover so it would not touch the center rib of the hood.
Csaba
'71 124 Spider, much modified
'17 124 Abarth, silver
http://italiancarclub.com/csaba/
Co-owner of the best dang Fiat parts place in town
dirk34

Re: 1.8 or 2.0 engine

Post by dirk34 »

Thx for the information.
I also like a engine that has a good torque.
@ Vandor; my engine has the block mounted distrubutor, so i hope that the hood-engine clearance will be ok.
User avatar
azruss
Posts: 3659
Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 12:24 pm
Your car is a: 80 Fiat 2000 FI

Re: 1.8 or 2.0 engine

Post by azruss »

you will still have contact with the center support of the hood and the cam belt cover. It isn't serious but you will see some rubbing there. I notched my center support.
User avatar
bradartigue
Posts: 2183
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 2:35 pm
Your car is a: 1970 Sport Spider
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: 1.8 or 2.0 engine

Post by bradartigue »

Keep what you have, rebuild it with new rings, bearings, valves, etc., and put the IDFs on it.
User avatar
RoyBatty
Posts: 852
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 11:44 pm
Your car is a: 1975 124 Spider - 1971 124 Sport Coupe
Location: Locust Grove, VA

Re: 1.8 or 2.0 engine

Post by RoyBatty »

Wait a second,
Did I just see Brad suggest someone mount IDF'S ?!?!!!
;)
Just kidding Brad.
dirk34

Re: 1.8 or 2.0 engine

Post by dirk34 »

azruss wrote:you will still have contact with the center support of the hood and the cam belt cover. It isn't serious but you will see some rubbing there. I notched my center support.
I also have a hood of a 2.0 l USA model. If i mounth that in stead of the Original european hood, the problem is solved, i think.
dirk34

Re: 1.8 or 2.0 engine

Post by dirk34 »

bradartigue wrote:Keep what you have, rebuild it with new rings, bearings, valves, etc., and put the IDFs on it.
Thanks Brad, but i already started to rebuild the 2.0 liter ( 1800 is still ok) . Next year whe going to do a trip to Italie, back where the spider came from, across the Frech alpes and Italian dolomits. I think i can use the extra power and torque crossing the mountain roads up to nearly 3000 m high :D :D .
User avatar
bradartigue
Posts: 2183
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 2:35 pm
Your car is a: 1970 Sport Spider
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: 1.8 or 2.0 engine

Post by bradartigue »

RoyBatty wrote:Wait a second,
Did I just see Brad suggest someone mount IDF'S ?!?!!!
;)
Just kidding Brad.
Yep - especially on small motors. The problems with 40 IDFs start around the 1800cc motors; they're too small. By the time you get the 2000cc you make sacrifices to make them work. But on a 1600cc (either one, 1585 or 1608) they're a lot of fun. Fun on a 1438cc as well.

I like twin carbs. My suggestions have always been for people to enjoy their cars, and you have to really like carburetors to deal with IDFs. If you just want to drive and have fun there are much better ways to go.
dirk34

Re: 1.8 or 2.0 engine

Post by dirk34 »

@ Brad , i always thought that the 40 idf's are too big for my 1600 cc engine.
Maybe i wil try this first, but i think i have a small problem whith the distributor, he is mounted on the block, not on the head. And what will be the best jet settings for my 1600 engine ? The carb's are the original webers of the 1608 BS1 engine, buth they have being used on a 2.0 engine.
Thx all
User avatar
bradartigue
Posts: 2183
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 2:35 pm
Your car is a: 1970 Sport Spider
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: 1.8 or 2.0 engine

Post by bradartigue »

dirk34 wrote:@ Brad , i always thought that the 40 idf's are too big for my 1600 cc engine.
Maybe i wil try this first, but i think i have a small problem whith the distributor, he is mounted on the block, not on the head. And what will be the best jet settings for my 1600 engine ? The carb's are the original webers of the 1608 BS1 engine, buth they have being used on a 2.0 engine.
Thx all
Jetting - no idea. There is a whole IDF setup thread on this website you should read. As far as the size I think they are a good match to the stock 1600cc engines in either displacement. I think they barely fit an 1800 and are awful on the 2000. I'm fairly certain the 2000 was designed for fuel injection and the wretched carburetor they came up with was a stop-gap because the FI system wasn't ready. There is no other excuse for it.
Post Reply