successful non-water coolant switch over

Keep it on topic, it will make it easier to find what you need.
Post Reply
east314

successful non-water coolant switch over

Post by east314 »

To anyone who might care and as an FYI, I had my 81 (which always was close to overheating while sitting in traffic as it is my daily driver in the Summer) switched over to a non-water based coolant this past off-season (no laughing I learned about the idea on Wheeler Dealers). I am pleased to report that (so far) the new coolant has worked like a champ and I have not yet been close to overheating when idling in traffic.
131
Posts: 672
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2010 1:13 am
Your car is a: 1982 131 Superbrava warmed 2.0 litre.
Location: Tasmania, Australia

Re: successful non-water coolant switch over

Post by 131 »

east314 wrote:switched over to a non-water based coolant this past off-season
If it's not water based, what is it?
Mick.

'82 2litre 131, rally cams, IDFs & headers.
User avatar
courtenay
Patron 2020
Patron 2020
Posts: 1321
Joined: Mon Nov 30, 2009 11:41 pm
Your car is a: 1980 Spider 2000
Location: Courtenay, BC, Canada

Re: successful non-water coolant switch over

Post by courtenay »

131 wrote:
east314 wrote:switched over to a non-water based coolant this past off-season
If it's not water based, what is it?
Probably a good single malt Scotch...
Bruce Shearer
'80 Spider Fi
'10 Volvo XC70
'06 GMC 1 Ton PU
'72 Spider a long, long time ago
SoFlaFiat

Re: successful non-water coolant switch over

Post by SoFlaFiat »

CHIANTI!!!!
rebar1111
Patron 2019
Patron 2019
Posts: 143
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2011 6:10 pm
Your car is a: 1979 124Spider
Location: Mentor, Ohio 44060

Re: successful non-water coolant switch over

Post by rebar1111 »

Could it be not warm enough? What is the stabilized operating temperature and thermostat rating?
TX82FIAT
Posts: 1814
Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 11:04 am
Your car is a: 82 Fiat Spider 2000 CSO
Location: San Antonio

Re: successful non-water coolant switch over

Post by TX82FIAT »

I don't think the benefit is really in the temp reduction. The benefit from what I have read if the slower change in temperature, a much higher boiling point, no corrosion and reported to last the lifetime of the car. I've thought about it but would love to hear from folks using it long term before moving away from a know product.
Buon giro a tutti! - enjoy the ride!

82 Fiat Spider 2000
03 BMW M3
07 Chevy Suburban
User avatar
4uall
Posts: 4145
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 12:09 pm
Your car is a: 1980 Fiat Pininfarina Spider 2000 F.I.
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Re: successful non-water coolant switch over

Post by 4uall »

Jay

Fiona
1980 FI 2000 Spider
ITZEBTZE

https://goo.gl/photos/eNKaX7hrXhBu9fmp6

FINN (FN-2187)
2014 Jeep Wrangler Sport
MYTHERPY
Exit98

Re: successful non-water coolant switch over

Post by Exit98 »

Yeah I saw that on Wheeler/Dealer too. Those British cars need all the cooling help they can get.

I've got to say though that Fiat's don't overheat. At least not when the cooling system is up to spec.

They just don't.

Maybe you have some blockage in the passages or had some air in the system or your fan wasn't functioning right.

Good luck with it and report back your experience.
User avatar
azruss
Posts: 3659
Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 12:24 pm
Your car is a: 80 Fiat 2000 FI

Re: successful non-water coolant switch over

Post by azruss »

There is no talk about the specific heat of this product. Seems its entire selling point is the fact its boiling point is so high. Lots to like though. Be interesting to see how much is hype.
User avatar
81SPIDERMATT
Posts: 1239
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 5:10 pm
Your car is a: 1981 spider 2000
Location: FORT COLLINS, CO

Re: successful non-water coolant switch over

Post by 81SPIDERMATT »

east314 wrote:To anyone who might care and as an FYI, I had my 81 (which always was close to overheating while sitting in traffic as it is my daily driver in the Summer) switched over to a non-water based coolant this past off-season (no laughing I learned about the idea on Wheeler Dealers). I am pleased to report that (so far) the new coolant has worked like a champ and I have not yet been close to overheating when idling in traffic.
did you use the prep fluid or just drain and fill .... how thick is it .... did you drill a hole in the reservoir cap ... how much did you buy and what was the total cost ... does it take longer for the car to get to operating temp.... interesting concept.... would love to see some long term info ....
east314

Re: successful non-water coolant switch over

Post by east314 »

My 81 spider was overheating regularly in rush-hour traffic, even with a second fan. I replaced the radiator, and still had a problem when at a standstill for long periods of time. So far, even when idling for long periods, I do not quite touch 190 on the gauge.
paulwall
Posts: 31
Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 10:33 am
Your car is a: fiat spider 1977

Re: successful non-water coolant switch over

Post by paulwall »

hi just to about to try this coolant for my self I have heard nothing but good Hear in spain we need all the help we can get to keep cool..also very good for corrosion prob is its bloody expensive..paul
FiatBen

Re: successful non-water coolant switch over

Post by FiatBen »

Guess I'll have to go do some research and figure out how this works. Off hand I don't see how a higher boiling point would accomplish anything. A cooling system is all about heat transfer, pulling the heat out of the block and discharging it to the air blowing thru the radiator. I would think a higher boiling point could be a problem because at least when the water boils it takes a lot of energy (heat) with it. What am I missing here (talking to self)?
ORFORD2004
Posts: 1120
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 9:48 pm
Your car is a: 1983 PININFARINA
Location: Sherbrooke, Qc, Canada

Re: successful non-water coolant switch over

Post by ORFORD2004 »

What is bad about water in a coolant?
1.The boiling point of water is only 100°C.
2.Because an engine operates very close to the boiling point of water,(within the engine block and cylinder head boiling actually occurs), thus causing pressure within the cooling system.
3.The boiling point of water is the failure temperature of the cooling system.
4.Water vapour (steam) has almost no thermal conductivity.
5.Water is aggressive toward cooling system metals and promotes electrolysis between dissimilar metals within the cooling system.
6.Water contains Oxygen which encourages corrosion in any cooling system
User avatar
azruss
Posts: 3659
Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 12:24 pm
Your car is a: 80 Fiat 2000 FI

Re: successful non-water coolant switch over

Post by azruss »

Fiatben, you are right about the energy required to turn water to steam. In this case, you dont want steam because it is a closed system and you need to condense it back to a liquid again. The purpose of pressurizing the system is to raise the boiling point. The addition of antifreeze not only acts to inhibit oxidation but also increases the boiling point as well as decrease the freezing point. Almost any additive (like salt) to water will increase the boiling point as well as decrease the freezing point. So this invites the question of why not use oil since it has a much higher boiling point than water. Oil has a very low specific heat, so it not good at pulling heat out of the metal. Water has a very high specific heat, so works well for this application. Moving the thermostat from interior to exterior provided a secondary circulation (skips the radiator) to help reduce these hot spots where the coolant can boil.
Post Reply