Side Marker Lights

Keeping it sharp - paint, wax, detailing, etc.
Post Reply
pda041376

Side Marker Lights

Post by pda041376 »

Showing off my "newbie" ignorance here...

I have an 80 model spider, and hate the way the side marker lights look like an aftermarket after-thought.
In some of the pictures I have seen posted there are side marker light that are angled into the fender/rear quarter as opposed to the flat-on-panel ones that I have. Is there a certain year replacement to look for to get the angled in housing (seems like 1971 ones had what I am talking about, but not sure how long they were like that)? Would the different year housing fit into the existing rectangular holes?
Ken

Re: Side Marker Lights

Post by Ken »

I put the earlier style on my 80, bu the holes are not the same and there is a right left.
Ken
LIQUIDLOUNGE

Re: Side Marker Lights

Post by LIQUIDLOUNGE »

interesting; I have a 76 and I like the flush ones better. So I guess they do interchange?
User avatar
azruss
Posts: 3659
Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 12:24 pm
Your car is a: 80 Fiat 2000 FI

Re: Side Marker Lights

Post by azruss »

those side lights were stock on the 70 only. I suspect they are hard to come by. I have a set that would require "rechroming".
pda041376

Re: Side Marker Lights

Post by pda041376 »

azruss wrote:those side lights were stock on the 70 only. I suspect they are hard to come by. I have a set that would require "rechroming".
Found what I was looking for. For some reason google failed me earlier when I searched, Midwest-Bayless has them. Interestingly they have the 1970 lights, never saw that version. Gets me thinking.

1970
http://www.midwest-bayless.com/storefro ... =251018320

1971-1978
http://www.midwest-bayless.com/storefro ... =273409738
leeputmanjr

Re: Side Marker Lights

Post by leeputmanjr »

The marker lights used '71 to '78 are the recessed style. '79 to '85 are flush with the surface. Sadly, these are NOT interchangeable, as I discovered the hard way. The older style have a slightly bigger rectangular opening.
pda041376

Re: Side Marker Lights

Post by pda041376 »

Yeah, I ended up buying all four corners from flea-bay. A little bit o' dremel action and all should be fine.
vandor
Posts: 3996
Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 1:23 pm
Your car is a: 1971 124 Spider
Location: Texas, USA

Re: Side Marker Lights

Post by vandor »

Ken wrote:I put the earlier style on my 80, bu the holes are not the same and there is a right left.
Ken
And a front and back :-)
Each are marked with 2 letters:

A= front
P = rear
S = left
D = right
Csaba
'71 124 Spider, much modified
'17 124 Abarth, silver
http://italiancarclub.com/csaba/
Co-owner of the best dang Fiat parts place in town
dom

Re: Side Marker Lights

Post by dom »

I always felt that the first side marker lights, the tiny round ones that so many like, look like an after thought. They look like they belong on a bicycle.
pda041376

Re: Side Marker Lights

Post by pda041376 »

dom wrote:I always felt that the first side marker lights, the tiny round ones that so many like, look like an after thought. They look like they belong on a bicycle.
Indeed sir, indeed.
User avatar
Curly
Posts: 526
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 1:09 am
Your car is a: 1968 AC Coupe and a 1976 CS1 Spider
Location: Gippsland - Victoria, Australia

Re: Side Marker Lights

Post by Curly »

It's a much cleaner look without the side lights all together. :wink:

Image
DeanJones

Re: Side Marker Lights

Post by DeanJones »

Curly wrote:It's a much cleaner look without the side lights all together. :wink:

Image

Curly, are they not required for compliance for driving on Oz roads? Thought they were, agree cleaner looking without.
User avatar
Curly
Posts: 526
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 1:09 am
Your car is a: 1968 AC Coupe and a 1976 CS1 Spider
Location: Gippsland - Victoria, Australia

Re: Side Marker Lights

Post by Curly »

DeanJones wrote: Curly, are they not required for compliance for driving on Oz roads? Thought they were, agree cleaner looking without.
G'day Dean, at some stage side lights were made mandatory under the ADRs (and they weren't as bad as the huge US lens dimensions); but it must have been after 1976 because my car passed a very picky engineering and compliance inspection without them.
I did however, have to paint the stainless steel windscreen wipers matt black as well as the polished spokes of the steeing wheel because in 1976 they introduced the ADR about no reflective surfaces in the driver's field of vision.
The paint seemed to lift off very easily when the car was given a decent wash :roll:
DeanJones

!

Post by DeanJones »

Curly wrote:
DeanJones wrote: Curly, are they not required for compliance for driving on Oz roads? Thought they were, agree cleaner looking without.
G'day Dean, at some stage side lights were made mandatory under the ADRs (and they weren't as bad as the huge US lens dimensions); but it must have been after 1976 because my car passed a very picky engineering and compliance inspection without them.
I did however, have to paint the stainless steel windscreen wipers matt black as well as the polished spokes of the steeing wheel because in 1976 they introduced the ADR about no reflective surfaces in the driver's field of vision.
The paint seemed to lift off very easily when the car was given a decent wash :roll:
Ok makes sense. Lucky for you. Not a big fan of the prickly engineers one has to deal with when gaining compliance for SA use. Purchased a near brand new 16 Sportswagon from VIC and went to Regency, ended me having to bring a mechanic back to spend 3 hours dismantling sections of the engine sot hey could clearly read the engine number..... Not impressed. Another friend registered a Brand new Prado transferring rego from NSW to SA, the factory tinting on the windows was not approved and had to take it to a retailer to get them removed. Luckily Toyota reimbursed them the money.....

Car looks great Curly. Hopefully see you at a 'meet' one day. Cheers.
Post Reply