EPA: Power tools that must be Solar by 2015

This is the place to discuss restoration problems, post questions or projects-complete or partial.
Post Reply
User avatar
dantye
Posts: 344
Joined: Mon Nov 30, 2009 8:00 am
Your car is a: all gone

EPA: Power tools that must be Solar by 2015

Post by dantye »

APRIL TOOL!
User avatar
124JOE
Posts: 3141
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 7:11 pm
Your car is a: 1978 124 fiat spider sport 1800
Location: SO. WI

Re: EPA: Power tools that must be Solar by 2015

Post by 124JOE »

haa you GOT ME
when you do everything correct people arent sure youve done anything at all (futurama)
ul1joe@yahoo.com 124joe@gmail.com
User avatar
dantye
Posts: 344
Joined: Mon Nov 30, 2009 8:00 am
Your car is a: all gone

Re: EPA: Power tools that must be Solar by 2015

Post by dantye »

124JOE wrote:haa you GOT ME
Looks like another couple of dozen, too, but I guess it takes a Cheese Head to be willing to admit it!
User avatar
RRoller123
Patron 2020
Patron 2020
Posts: 8179
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2011 2:04 pm
Your car is a: 1980 FI SPIDER 2000
Location: SAGAMORE BEACH, MA USA

Re: EPA: Power tools that must be Solar by 2015

Post by RRoller123 »

I thought this reg was released just after the 2008 election? Isn't this old news?
'80 FI Spider 2000
'74 and '79 X1/9 (past)
'75 BMW R75/6
2011 Chevy Malibu (daily driver)
2010 Chevy Silverado 2500HD Ext Cab 4WD/STD BED
2002 Edgewater 175CC 80HP 4-Stroke Yamaha
2003 Jaguar XK8
2003 Jaguar XKR
2021 Jayco 22RB
2019 Bianchi Torino Bicycle
User avatar
dantye
Posts: 344
Joined: Mon Nov 30, 2009 8:00 am
Your car is a: all gone

Re: EPA: Power tools that must be Solar by 2015

Post by dantye »

RRoller123 wrote:I thought this reg was released just after the 2008 election? Isn't this old news?
Sounds right, but seriously:

NOAA announced about a month ago that they have discovered initial evidence that an increase in cloud cover seems to be developing world-wide, possibly as nature's regulatory mechanism for global warming. Of course, that news was immediately "back burnered" by the White House as politically untenable for the EPA and a certain former VP, since it would make solar a less viable choice, and global warming less of a threat.

Wind power is another matter, since so much of it will no doubt continue to blow out of Washington, whichever way the election goes.

So it seems a safe bet that 110V a.c., nicad and lithium ion will continue to be good power tool choices! :wink:
User avatar
124JOE
Posts: 3141
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 7:11 pm
Your car is a: 1978 124 fiat spider sport 1800
Location: SO. WI

Re: EPA: Power tools that must be Solar by 2015

Post by 124JOE »

yep it looks that way
when you do everything correct people arent sure youve done anything at all (futurama)
ul1joe@yahoo.com 124joe@gmail.com
User avatar
RRoller123
Patron 2020
Patron 2020
Posts: 8179
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2011 2:04 pm
Your car is a: 1980 FI SPIDER 2000
Location: SAGAMORE BEACH, MA USA

Re: EPA: Power tools that must be Solar by 2015

Post by RRoller123 »

As an Engineering student in 1976 I think it was, I worked for the D.O.E. /Northeast Solar Energy Center one summer, writing technical position papers on Solar and Wind energy. The problem back then with solar, and it remains today, that never gets talked about is the fact that so many different trades are required to install a residential system. You need plumbers, electricians, roof penetrations, carpenters, etc. and the costs just always got out of hand. Each trade needs a few grand to make it worthwhile, and the project costs go way up. Same reason renovating a wet bath costs so much.
'80 FI Spider 2000
'74 and '79 X1/9 (past)
'75 BMW R75/6
2011 Chevy Malibu (daily driver)
2010 Chevy Silverado 2500HD Ext Cab 4WD/STD BED
2002 Edgewater 175CC 80HP 4-Stroke Yamaha
2003 Jaguar XK8
2003 Jaguar XKR
2021 Jayco 22RB
2019 Bianchi Torino Bicycle
User avatar
dantye
Posts: 344
Joined: Mon Nov 30, 2009 8:00 am
Your car is a: all gone

Re: EPA: Power tools that must be Solar by 2015

Post by dantye »

RRoller123 wrote:As an Engineering student in 1976 I think it was, I worked for the D.O.E. /Northeast Solar Energy Center one summer, writing technical position papers on Solar and Wind energy. The problem back then with solar, and it remains today, that never gets talked about is the fact that so many different trades are required to install a residential system. You need plumbers, electricians, roof penetrations, carpenters, etc. and the costs just always got out of hand. Each trade needs a few grand to make it worthwhile, and the project costs go way up. Same reason renovating a wet bath costs so much.
So true - - We had this "liquid/mass" system Solar Heated house in Indiana. You can see a bit of the top of the huge collector panel array above the roof peak. It stored the heat from the collecting liquid in a 250 gal. water heater and a box of rocks about half the size of a one-car garage, located between the garage and the house. The builder had a terrible time selling it NEW, so he gave us a 7% 7 year contract when market Mtg. interest rates were about 14% in 1981. I'm sure he took a loss on it. When we moved to Wisconsin several years later It took us a year to sell, and we took a small loss on it, but we had VERY LOW heating bills during the years we were there. The next owners removed the solar system completely when the massive maintenance costs caught up with them, so your point is right on.

BTW - That's a Mercury Lynx - real sporty! :P
Image
Kent124

Re: EPA: Power tools that must be Solar by 2015

Post by Kent124 »

dantye wrote:BTW - That's a Mercury Lynx - real sporty! :P
I thought it was a "sporty" Ford Escort. Too good looking for a Chevette.
User avatar
RRoller123
Patron 2020
Patron 2020
Posts: 8179
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2011 2:04 pm
Your car is a: 1980 FI SPIDER 2000
Location: SAGAMORE BEACH, MA USA

Re: EPA: Power tools that must be Solar by 2015

Post by RRoller123 »

I ended up getting my Engineering degree in Solar Engineering from Boston University, but there were so few jobs I ended up going into computer manufacturing and it is a good thing too! Turned out well. I am still a big fan of small scale residential solar, but they need to be air based systems. Even though they are less efficient, the costs are far less to design and install, and an air leak isn't too big a deal <{:^) A fluid leak in a wet system is a nightmare if it starts in your attic! Especially if it is a system that uses dyed water/tube collectors, or a chemical working fluid. No thanks.
'80 FI Spider 2000
'74 and '79 X1/9 (past)
'75 BMW R75/6
2011 Chevy Malibu (daily driver)
2010 Chevy Silverado 2500HD Ext Cab 4WD/STD BED
2002 Edgewater 175CC 80HP 4-Stroke Yamaha
2003 Jaguar XK8
2003 Jaguar XKR
2021 Jayco 22RB
2019 Bianchi Torino Bicycle
donm
Patron 2018
Patron 2018
Posts: 294
Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 12:40 pm
Your car is a: 1980 spider [carb]
Location: Hamilton. MA

Re: EPA: Power tools that must be Solar by 2015

Post by donm »

My house has a solar hot water system that was installed by the original owner about 25 years ago. In theory it saves me money in the winter because it preheats the street water before it gets to my oil fired hot water heater, and shortly after moving here, I re-plumbed the system so that in the summer months I can turn some valves to bypass the burner altogether, meaning I don't burn any oil at all.

I say "in theory" because I once had to replace the electric back-up storage tank, about $600, and I've also had to go up on the roof to replace the glazing on the solar collectors when a tree branch fell on them. Oh, and I shouldn't forget that occasionally I have to change the water/AF mixture and reprime the whole system because even though it uses copper and silicone tubing, it still leaks out somehow. But I do love getting "free" hot water!
1979 Spider
2001Saab SW
2004 Saab Aero
Life's too short to drive boring cars
Post Reply